Selvick v. Brazelton, et al.

Filing 33

ORDER Vacating September 24, 2014 Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/16/2014. It is ORDERED that the hearing set for September 24, 2014 is VACATED.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DALE D. SELVICK, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:14-cv-00363-LJO-SAB ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 HEARING v. PAUL D. BRAZELTON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dale D. Selvick filed this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 on 18 March 11, 2014, alleging deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On 19 August 18, 2014 Defendants Jeffery A. Beard, Edmund G. Brown, Matthew Cate and the State 20 of California filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. On August 22, 2014 21 Defendants Felix Igbinosa and Dwight Winslow filed a notice of joinder in the motion to dismiss 22 and a separate motion to dismiss. A September 24, 2014 hearing is set for argument on 23 Defendants’ motions to dismiss. 24 Pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff was to file any 25 opposition to the motions to dismiss fourteen days prior to the hearing. L.R. 230(c). Plaintiff 26 has not filed a timely opposition and a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to 27 be heard in opposition to a motion at oral argument. Id. 28 The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral 1 1 argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on 2 September 24, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 will be vacated and the parties will not be 3 required to appear at that time. This matter is deemed submitted. Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing set for September 4 5 24, 2014 is VACATED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: September 16, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?