Paris v. Singh

Filing 31

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/24/16. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 PAUL ERIC PARIS, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 Case No. 1:14-cv-00391-MJS (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. IKWINDER SINGH, (ECF No. 30) Defendant. NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18 19 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Singh for inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF Nos. 5, 24.) 1 On September 9, 2016, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 2 No. 30.) 3 Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s 4 motion, and the time for doing so has passed. Local Rule 230(l). The Court will give 5 Plaintiff one further opportunity to respond to the motion: Plaintiff must file an opposition 6 or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment within 7 twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this Order. 8 Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 9 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), 10 the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing 11 the motion: 12 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed 13 pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). 14 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to 15 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an 16 opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, 17 with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition 18 must be filed not more twenty one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Id. 19 3. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment without trial, and in 20 favor of Defendant, on some or all of Plaintiff’s claims. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). 21 Defendant’s motion sets forth the facts which he contends are not reasonably subject to 22 dispute and that entitle him to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is 23 called the statement of undisputed facts. Local Rule 260(a). 24 Plaintiff has the right to oppose the motion for summary judgment. To oppose the 25 motion, Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set 26 forth in Defendant’s motion but argue that Defendant is not entitled to judgment as a 27 matter of law. In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in 28 Defendant’s motion, he may show that Defendant’s facts are disputed in one or more of 2 1 the following ways: (1) Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of 2 perjury in the complaint or the opposition if (a) the complaint or opposition shows that 3 Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and (b) Plaintiff calls to the 4 Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or opposition upon which Plaintiff relies; 5 (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth the facts which Plaintiff believes 6 prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but Plaintiff must prove that 7 the records are what he claims they are;2 or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon all or any part of 8 the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions 9 obtained in this proceeding. Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendant’s motion with 10 declarations or other evidence, Defendant’s evidence will be taken as truth, and final 11 judgment may be entered without a full trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). In opposing Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b) 12 13 requires Plaintiff to reproduce Defendant’s itemized facts in the statement of undisputed 14 facts and admit those facts which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If 15 Plaintiff disputes (denies) a fact, Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that 16 denial (e.g., pleading, declaration, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other 17 document). Local Rule 260(b). 18 4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is 19 not yet able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will 20 consider a request to postpone consideration of Defendant’s motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 56(d). Any request to postpone consideration of Defendant’s motion for summary 22 judgment must include the following: (1) a declaration setting forth the specific facts 23 Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a showing that the facts exist, and (3) 24 1 A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) 25 which are based on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement is competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A 26 declaration must be dated and signed under penalty of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28 27 U.S.C. § 1746. 2 Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served on the 28 opposing party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). 3 1 a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion for summary judgment. 2 Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009); Tatum v. City 3 and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of 4 California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the 5 motion for summary judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would 6 preclude summary judgment. Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 11007 01; Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b). 8 5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty 9 of perjury have no evidentiary value. 10 6. The failure of any party to comply with this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the 12 imposition of sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of 13 default. 14 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or 15 statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment within twenty16 one (21) days of the service of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or 17 statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, the Court dismiss the action 18 with prejudice for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2016 /s/ 22 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?