Mow-N-Edge Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

Filing 44

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/16/2017. (The parties are ORDERED to show cause in writing by Friday, 6/16/2017, why sanctions should not be imposed due to their for failure to file the dispositional documents as directed in the 1/19/2017 court order and as reflected in the stipulations which have been filed with the court by the parties in this action. Alternatively, counsel may file the required stipulated dismissal.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MOW-N-EDGE CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 1:14-cv-00396-DAD-EPG ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant. 17 18 On January 19, 2017, the court issued an order regarding the disbursal of interplead funds. 19 (Doc. No. 43.) Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, that order provided that “[p]laintiff and 20 [defendant National Union Insurance Company] shall execute a stipulation and proposed order of 21 dismissal of plaintiff’s first amended compliant with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal 22 Rules of Civil Procedure within 5 (five) days after the payment specified in paragraph two of this 23 order.” (Id. at 2.) Over four months have now passed since that order was issued and the parties 24 have still not executed a stipulation of dismissal. 25 The court therefore orders the parties to show cause in writing by Friday, June 16, 2017, 26 why sanctions should not be imposed due to their for failure to file the dispositional documents as 27 directed in the January 19, 2017 court order and as reflected in the stipulations which have been 28 filed with the court by the parties in this action. Alternatively, counsel may file the required 1 1 stipulated dismissal. The parties are forewarned, that should they fail to respond to this order to 2 show cause in writing and/or fail to file dispositional documents, as required by this order, 3 sanctions will be imposed. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 42–46 (1991) 4 (recognizing that it is within the inherent authority of the court to control its docket and require 5 compliance with its orders). 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: May 16, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?