Bowen v. M. Caratan, Inc.
Filing
8
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/7/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 7/17/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 10/6/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 8/15/2014; Non-Expert 5/1/2015; Expert 7/10/2015. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 2/23/2015 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 7/20/2015; Hearing by 8/17/2015. Dispositive Motion D eadlines: Filed by 8/31/2015; Hearing by 10/14/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 12/9/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 2/9/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JANET BOWEN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
M. CARATAN, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1: 14-CV-00397 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 10/6/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 8/15/2014
Non-Expert: 5/1/2015
Expert: 7/10/2015
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
2/23/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/20/2015
Hearing: 8/17/2015
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/31/2015
Hearing: 10/14/2015
20
21
22
Pre-Trial Conference:
12/9/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
23
24
Trial:
25
26
27
28
1
2/9/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 4-5 days
1
I.
July 7, 2014.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Randall Rumph appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
Todd Kinnear appeared on behalf of Defendant.
6
III.
Magistrate Judge Consent:
7
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing
8
Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of
9
the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set
10
before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older
11
civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a
12
continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that
13
14
of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize
15
criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge
16
may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States
18
Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United
19
20
States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the
21
Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
22
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
23
District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
24
25
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
26
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
27
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
28
///
2
1
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2
3
motion to amend, no later than October 6, 2014.
4
V.
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
5
6
on or before August 15, 2014.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before May 1,
7
8
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before July 10, 2015.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before May 15, 2015,
9
10
and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before June 12, 2015. The written designation of retained and
11
non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and
12
shall include all information required thereunder.1 Failure to designate experts in compliance with
13
this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such
14
experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
15
16
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
17
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
18
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
19
20
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for February 23, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before the
21
22
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
23
California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed
24
by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall
25
be e-mailed, in Word format, to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the
26
discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to
27
28
1
In the event an expert will opine on an independent medical examination or mental health examination, the opinions
related to the examination must be set forth in the expert’s report.
3
1
completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
2
CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk
3
no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
4
VI.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
5
6
than July 20, 2015, and heard on or before August 17, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard before
7
the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in
8
Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
9
10
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
11
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
12
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
13
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
14
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
15
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
16
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
17
and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
18
19
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
20
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
21
22
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
23
before the noticed hearing date.
24
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than August 31, 2015, and heard no later
25
than October 14, 2015, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United
26
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
27
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
28
///
4
1
VII.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
2
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
3
adjudication the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the
4
issues to be raised in the motion of the motion.
5
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
6
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
7
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
8
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
9
expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.
10
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the joint statement of
11
undisputed facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a
12
joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as
13
14
ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
15
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
16
December 9, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.
17
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
18
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
19
directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at LJOorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
20
21
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
22
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
23
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
24
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
25
IX.
26
27
28
Trial Date
February 9, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,
United States District Court Judge.
A.
This is a jury trial.
5
1
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 4-5 days.
2
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
3
California, Rule 285.
4
X.
Settlement Conference
If the parties believe the action is in a settlement posture and believe a conference with the
5
6
Court would be fruitful, they may file a joint written request for a settlement conference, at which time
7
a settlement conference will before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston.
8
XI.
Techniques to Shorten Trial
9
Not applicable at this time.
10
11
12
13
14
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
15
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
16
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
17
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal
18
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
19
XIV. Effect of this Order
20
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
21
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
22
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
23
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
24
subsequent status conference.
25
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
26
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
27
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
28
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
6
1
2
for granting the relief requested.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 7, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?