Martinez v. Beard et al

Filing 100

ORDER CLOSING CASE; Stipulation to Dismiss filed, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 06/29/2017. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

v.
BEARD, et al.,

15
16

Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC)

Defendants.
On June 28, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice

17

pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may

18

dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties

19

who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

20

Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 9), it

21

“automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir.

22

1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 29, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE