Martinez v. Beard et al

Filing 100

ORDER CLOSING CASE; Stipulation to Dismiss filed, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 06/29/2017. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE CASE v. BEARD, et al., 15 16 Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC) Defendants. On June 28, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice 17 pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may 18 dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties 19 who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 20 Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 9), it 21 “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 22 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 29, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?