Martinez v. Beard et al

Filing 62

ORDER Granting 60 Second Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order; ORDER 61 Granting in Camera Review signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/10/2016. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-AWI-JLT (PC)
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
STIPULATION TO AMEND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. 60)

BEARD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN CAMERA REVIEW
(Doc. 61)

16
17

The Court has reviewed and considered the parties’ Second Stipulation to Modify the

18

Scheduling Order. (Doc. 60.) The Court finds that good cause exists to amend the case schedule

19

as stipulated by the parties and to conduct the in camera review (Doc. 61) as requested.

20

Accordingly the Court ORDERS:

21

1.

The depositions of Defendant Butler, CDCR employees Abney and Kitchon, and Lucy

22

Martinez SHALL be completed and any motions related to non-expert discovery

23

SHALL be filed no later than May 2, 2016,.

24

2.

No later than March 18, 2016, counsel for Defendants SHALL lodge, via an email to

25

[e-mail] the records “concerning investigations conducted into

26

allegations of excessive force against Defendant Butler subpoenaed by Plaintiff, as well as

27

confidential records concerning investigations conducted by CCHCS in response to

28
1

1

Plaintiff’s grievances.”

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated:

March 10, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2