Hernandez v. Aye, et al.
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to Comply With Court Order and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/28/15. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FAUSTINO LEON HERNANDEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:14-cv-00428 DLB PC
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
KHIN AYE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Faustino Leon Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro
17
18
se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on
19
March 26, 2014.1
On March 11, 2015, the Court screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend.
20
21
Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of service of
22
the order. Over thirty (30) days passed and Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise
23
communicate with the Court. Accordingly, on April 22, 2015, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause
24
why this action should not be dismissed for failure to follow a court order and for failure to
25
prosecute. Plaintiff was ordered to file a response to the order within twenty-one (21) days. Over
26
twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s order in any manner.
27
Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action.
28
1
On April 7, 2014, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED for failure to
prosecute and failure to follow a court order.
This terminates this action in its entirety.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
May 28, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?