Porter et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 25

ORDER Striking Plaintiff's 23 Notice of Counter-Offer / Settlement Offer, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/5/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNA PORTER, et al., 14 15 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF COUNTER-OFFER/SETTLEMENT OFFER Plaintiffs, 12 13 Case No. 1:14-cv-00431-LJO-SAB v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., ECF NO. 23 Defendants. 16 17 On May 1, 2014, Plaintiffs Donna Porter and Lynn Porter (“Plaintiffs”) filed a document 18 with the Court entitled “Notice of Counter-Offer/Settlement Offer.” (ECF No. 23.) It is unclear 19 why this document was sent by Plaintiffs to the Court. Since this document has no apparent 20 purpose with the Court, the Court will strike the document from its records. 21 Plaintiffs’ filing also contains archaic legal verbiage, commonly associated with the 22 common law pleading practice, that serves no purpose in modern pleading practice. Plaintiffs 23 are advised that common law pleading and procedural practice has long been abolished by the 24 adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1937, and it is no longer necessary to recite 25 archaic and complex legal terms in pleadings filed with the Court. See 5 Charles Alan Wright & 26 Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1181 (3d ed. 2012) (discussing modern 27 “simple and elastic pleading and motion procedure ... placing a minimum emphasis on form” and 28 the abolishment of “ancient procedural dogma”). 1 1 Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ May 1, 2014 2 “Notice of Counter-Offer/Settlement Offer” is STRICKEN from the record. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 5, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?