Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 et al v. County of Calaveras
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/11/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MATTHEW J. GAUGER, Bar No. 139785
KERIANNE R. STEELE, Bar No. 250897
GARY P. PROVENCHER, Bar No. 250923
ANTHONY TUCCI, Bar No. 288819
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
428 J Street, Suite 520
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone (916) 443-6600
Fax (916) 442-0244
E-Mail: mgauger@unioncounsel.net
ksteele@unioncounsel.net
gprovencher@unioncounsel.net
atucci@unioncounsel.net
8
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, LOCAL 1021 and NICOLLE PAAPKE
13
WILLIAM H. LITTLEWOOD, Bar No. 202877
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
7647 North Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone (559) 433-1300
Fax (559) 433-2300
E-Mail: william.littlewood@mccormickbarstow.com
14
Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF CALAVERAS
11
12
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
18
19
20
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, LOCAL 1021, and NICOLLE
PAAPKE,
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
v.
(Doc. 23)
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a California
General Law County,
Defendant.
26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
428 J Street, Suite 520
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 443-6600
No. 1:14-CV-00483-GSA
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Case No. 1:14-cv-00483-GSA
1
2
1.
On October 15, 2014, the parties participated in an early Settlement Conference
before the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe.
3
2.
The parties successfully settled the action. At that time, the Court ordered the
4
parties to complete their settlement agreement or appear at a Show Cause hearing on December 3,
5
2014.
6
3.
The parties have executed a Settlement Agreement and that Agreement is attached
7
and incorporated herein as though fully set forth as Exhibit A. The Agreement requires that
8
within ten (10) days after payment of the Settlement Sum, the Plaintiffs file a Stipulation for
9
Settlement and Proposed Order.
10
11
12
4.
The Settlement Sum having been paid, the parties now submit the instant request
to the Court for Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.
4.
The parties hereto mutually state that they have read the foregoing Stipulation for
13
Dismissal with Prejudice. This Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice constitutes the agreement
14
of the parties and is entered into on the dates below indicated.
15
16
Dated: December 3, 2014
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
17
18
/s/ Matthew J. Gauger
MATTHEW J. GAUGER
By:
19
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,
LOCAL 1021 and NICOLLE PAAPKE
20
21
22
23
Dated: December 3, 2014
MCCORMICK BARSTOW, ET AL, LLP
24
25
26
27
/s/ William H. Littlewood
WILLIAM H. LITTLEWOOD
By:
Attorneys for DEFENDANT COUNTY OF
CALAVERAS
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
1
A Professional Corporation
428 J Street, Suite 520
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 443-6600
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Case No. 1:14-CV-00483-GSA
1
2
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Good cause having been shown, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to the
3
foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, the parties’ Settlement Agreement, and Fed.
4
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case upon issuance of this Order.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 11, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
134435/788565
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
2
A Professional Corporation
428 J Street, Suite 520
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 443-6600
Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
Case No. 1:14-CV-00483-GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?