Torres v. Diaz et al

Filing 192

ORDER denying 191 Third Motion for Extension of time to reply to Defendants' Discovery Requests as unnecessary signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/28/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JUAN MATIAS TORRES, Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 12 13 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS AS UNNECESSARY pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion to extend the time to respond to 16 17 Case No.: 1:14-cv-00492-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Juan Matias Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants’ discovery requests, filed February 27, 2017. Inasmuch as on February 17, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond 18 19 to Defendants’ discovery requests until after resolution of the pending motions to compel, Plaintiff’s 20 third request for a further extension of the deadline is unnecessary and shall be denied. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: 24 February 28, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?