Torres v. Diaz et al

Filing 192

ORDER denying 191 Third Motion for Extension of time to reply to Defendants' Discovery Requests as unnecessary signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/28/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JUAN MATIAS TORRES,
Plaintiff,

9
v.

10
11

RALPH M. DIAZ, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY
REQUESTS AS UNNECESSARY

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion to extend the time to respond to

16
17

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00492-DAD-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Juan Matias Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Defendants’ discovery requests, filed February 27, 2017.
Inasmuch as on February 17, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time to respond

18
19

to Defendants’ discovery requests until after resolution of the pending motions to compel, Plaintiff’s

20

third request for a further extension of the deadline is unnecessary and shall be denied.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:

24

February 28, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1