Torres v. Diaz et al

Filing 66

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39 AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER TO OBTAIN CONFIDENTIAL CALLS DURING DISCOVERY PHASE OF LITIGATION 38 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/28/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

1

Thanks!

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JUAN MATIAS TORRES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
RALPH M. DIAZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00492-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER TO OBTAIN
CONFIDENTIAL CALLS DURING DISCOVERY
PHASE OF LITIGATION
[ECF Nos. 38, 39]

Plaintiff Juan Matias Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On March 19, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was

20

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and

21

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no

22

objections were filed.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on March 19, 2015, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a court order to obtain confidential calls during the discovery

4

phase of litigation is DENIED.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: May 28, 2015

8

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2