Kinney v. Brazelton, et al.

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 36 Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/21/2015. Nunc Pro Tunc deadline is October 2, 2015 (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DIJON KINNEY, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00503-AWI-MJS (PC) Plaintiff, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (ECF No. 36) Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against 18 Defendant Flores on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for medical indifference and 19 cruel and unusual punishment. 20 Before the Court is Defendant’s September 16, 2015 motion to extend the 21 dispositive motion deadline from September 17, 2015 to October 2, 2015. (ECF No. 36.) 22 23 24 Defendant explains that the motion is based on Plaintiff’s failure to produce responsive documents at his deposition as required under the Notice of Deposition, and Defendant’s belated receipt of Plaintiff’s deposition transcript. Defendant thereafter filed his 25 dispositive motion on October 2, 2015. (ECF No. 37.) 26 The Court finds good cause for extending the dispositive motion deadline. 27 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline (ECF No. 36) 28 1 is HEREBY GRANTED, and the time for filing dispositive motions is extended nunc pro 2 tunc to October 2, 2015. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 21, 2015 /s/ 6 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?