Kinney v. Brazelton, et al.
Filing
75
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Plaintiff Dijon Kinney, CDCR# AA-8634 for Settlement Conference on December 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/04/2016. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DIJON KINNEY,
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00503-AWI-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
P.D. BRAZELTON, et al.,
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AD TESTIFICANDUM
Defendants.
/
Dijon Kinney, CDCR # AA-8634, a necessary and material witness in a settlement
conference in this case on December 5, 2016, is confined in California City Correctional
Facility, in the custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is
necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the
custodian to produce the inmate before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, on
Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a
settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the
settlement conference or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this
inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: Warden, California City Correctional Facility, P. O. Box 2626, California City,
California 93505:
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge
McAuliffe at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or
as ordered by the court.
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the
inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 4, 2016
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?