Moore v. Kaur, et al

Filing 9

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER for extenion of time to respond to complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/2014. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Bruce A. Neilson #096952 7108 N. Fresno St. #190 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone (559) 432-9831 Facsimile (559) 432-1837 Attorney for Defendants Hardip Kaur and Kuldip Singh, dba Parkway Mini Mart 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ***** )))))) ) CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00512-SAB RONALD MOORE, ) ) SECOND STIPULATION AND Plaintiff, ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION ) OF TIME FOR HARDIP KAUR, vs. ) individually and dba PARKWAY MINI ) MART and KULDIP SINGH, HARDIP KAUR, individually and dba ) individually and dba PARKWAY MINI PARKWAY MINI MART; KULDIP SINGH, ) MART TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT individually and dba PARKWAY MINI ) MART; ) Defendants. ) _ _______________ _ ) 16 17 WHEREAS: 18 1. Plaintiff Ronald Moore filed this action on April 11, 2014. 19 2. This is the second request for an extension of time for Defendants HARDIP KAUR, 20 individually and dba PARKWAY MINI MART and KULDIP SINGH, individually and dba 21 PARKWAY MINI MART (collectively referred to "Defendants"). A previous extension of time 22 was granted by the plaintiff within the statutory allowance; thus, court approval is required for a 23 further extension of time. 24 3. Plaintiff and Defendants are in settlement negotiations at this time. 25 4. Plaintiff has sent to Defendants a proposed settlement agreement for Defendants to review 26 to settle this case. 27 28 1 2 3 5. The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources. 6. The parties have agreed to extend Defendants' time to respond to the complaint until July 4 5 25, 2014, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that time. 6 7. 7 the mandatory scheduling conference. 8 9 This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff Ronald Moore, through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants HARDIP KAUR, 10 individually and dba PARKWAY MINI MART and KULDIP SINGH, individually and dba 11 PARKWAY MINI MART to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up 12 to and including July 25, 2014, pending court approval. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 MOORE LAW FIRM, PC Dated: June 30, 2014 ______/s/Tanya Moore Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore Dated: June 30, 2014 ______/s/Bruce A. Neilson ___ Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants Hardip Kaur and Kuldip Singh, dba Parkway Mini Mart 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?