Reno Rios v. Gipson et al

Filing 16

ORDER denying 8 Motion to screen the complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/30/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

RENO RIOS,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO SCREEN THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

10
11

Case No. 1:14-cv-00520-BAM-PC

v.
(ECF NO. 8)

12

C. GIPSON, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
15

Plaintiff Reno Rios is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for screening filed
17 on February 10, 2016 (ECF No. 8).
18

On February 16, 2016, an order was entered, directing Plaintiff to either file a first

19 amended complaint, or proceed on the claims found to be cognizable in the original complaint.
20 Plaintiff’s motion for screening is therefore moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
21 Plaintiff’s motion to screen the complaint filed on February 10, 2016, is DENIED as moot.
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

September 30, 2016

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1