Robles v. AgReserves, Inc. et al

Filing 13

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/1/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 8/11/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 10/1/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 8/8/2014; Non-Expert 6/15/2015; Expert 8/24/2015. Mid -Discovery Status Conference set for 1/15/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/9/2015; Hearing by 10/7/2015. Dispositive Motion Deadli nes: Filed by 10/20/2015; Hearing by 12/1/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 1/16/2016 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Jury Trial set for 3/22/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JUAN CARLOS ROBLES,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

v.
AGRESERVES, INC., et al,

14

Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 14-CV-00540-AWI - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 10/1/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 8/8/2014
Non-Expert: 6/15/2015
Expert: 8/24/2015
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
1/15/2015, 9:00 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/9/2015
Hearing: 10/7/2015

18
19
20

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 10/20/2015
Hearing: 12/1/2015

21
22

Pre-Trial Conference:
1/16/2016 at 10:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2

23
24

Trial:

25
26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
August 1, 2014.
1

3/22/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2
Jury trial: 7-10 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Ann Guleser on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Richard Marca appeared on behalf of Defendants.

4
5

III.

Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division

6

of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire

7

nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely

8

manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as

9

expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may

10

find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any

11

criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial

12

even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these

13

circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All

14

parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding

15

will trail the completion of the criminal trial.

16

The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all

17

proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including

18

entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local

19

Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United States

20

District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is

21

taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. However, the parties are

22

hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to

23

consent.

24

Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing

25

United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant

26

to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

27

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

28

District of California.
2

Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

1
2

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

3

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

4

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

5

IV.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

6
7

motion to amend, no later than October 1, 2014.

8

V.

9
10
11
12

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before August 8, 2014.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June
15, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before August 24, 2015.

13

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before June 29, 2015,

14

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before July 27, 2015. The written designation of retained and

15

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

16

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

17

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

18

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

19

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

20

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

21

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

22

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

23
24
25

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for January 15, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the

26

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

27

California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all

28

counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall be e3

1

mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

2

discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

3

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via

4

CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk

5

no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

6

VI.

7

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

8

than September 9, 2015, and heard on or before October 7, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard

9

at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United

10
11

States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

12

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

13

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

14

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

15

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

16

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

17

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

18

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

19

and dropped from calendar.

20

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

21

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

22

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.

23

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

24

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

25

before the noticed hearing date.

26

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than October 20, 2015, and heard no

27

later than December 1, 2015, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii,

28

United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R.
4

1

Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

2

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

3

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

4

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the

5

issues to be raised in the motion.

6

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

7

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

8

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

9

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

10

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.
In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a joint

11
12

statement of undisputed facts. The joint statement of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that

13

the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be deemed true. Thus, the moving party SHALL

14

provide opposing counsel a complete, proposed statement of undisputed facts at least five days before

15

the conference.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred or

16
17

set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

18

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

19

January 16, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.

20

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

21

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

22

directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

23
24

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

25

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

26

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

27

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

28

///
5

1

IX.

March 22, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United

2
3

Trial Date

States District Court Judge.

4

A.

This is a jury trial.

5

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 7-10 days.

6

C.

Counsel's attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

7

California, Rule 285.

8

X.

Settlement Conference

9

If the parties believe the action is in a settlement posture, the parties may file a joint written

10

request for a settlement conference with the Court. The settlement conference will be conducted by

11

Magistrate Judge Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a

12

judicial officer who is not assigned to this matter, that party is directed to notify the Court no

13

later than 60 days in advance of the requested settlement conference to allow sufficient time for

14

another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.

15

XI.

Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

16

Techniques to Shorten Trial

17

Not applicable at this time.

18
19
20
21

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

22

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

23

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

24

handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as

25

provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern

26

District of California.

27

XIV. Effect of this Order

28

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
6

1

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

2

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

3

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

4

subsequent status conference.

5

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

6

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

7

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

8

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

9

for granting the relief requested.

10

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 1, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
7