Robles v. AgReserves, Inc. et al
Filing
73
SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/19/2016. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JUAN CARLOS ROBLES,
9
CASE NO. 1:14-CV-0540 AWI JLT
Plaintiff
10
v.
11
AGRESERVES, INC., et al.,
12
13
14
SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER
Defendant
_____________________________________
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
15
On February 19, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to change the date for filing motions in
16
limine from February 22, 2016 to February 26, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. Additionally, Defendants have
17
requested inclusion of additional exhibits, and represent that Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to the
18
addition. The Court will give effect to the stipulation, and will add the additional exhibits based
19
on defense counsel’s representations.
20
Finally, Plaintiff has filed an objection to the pre-trial order and asks that 62 exhibits be
21
identified and added to the pre-trial order. See Doc. No. 71. The list of 62 exhibits appears to be
22
identical to a list that was provided by Plaintiff on February 12, 2016. Cf. id. with Doc. No. 62. It
23
appears to the Court that the 62 items are already included in the Pre-Trial order. Cf. Docs. 62, 71
24
with Doc. No. 69. If Plaintiff believes that a particular exhibit has been omitted, Plaintiff may file
25
a separate request to modify the pre-trial order and identify the particular exhibit(s) that should be
26
added. For now, and in the absence of particularly identified exhibit(s), the Court will not
27
28
supplement the pre-trial order with respect to Plaintiff’s exhibits.
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
4
The deadline for filing motions in limine is RESET from February 22, 2016 to on or by
4:00 p.m. on February 26, 2016;
2.
The following exhibits shall appear under Section VIII(A) of the Pre-Trial Order
5
(Defendants’ List of Exhibits):
6
a.
7
Evaluation Report of Juan Carlos Robles by Dr. Michael E. Kania AGR0014831508;
8
b.
Photographs of Agreserves worksites and geography in general and specifically at:
9
i.
Wasco
10
ii.
Sherwood
11
iii.
Whisler East
12
iv.
Riverside
13
v.
Beech;
14
3.
Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 71) are OVERRULED without prejudice to refiling a
15
particularized request to add exhibits (within the remaining time provided by Pre-Trial
16
Order for filing objections);
17
4.
All other dates, deadlines, and sections of the Pre-Trial Order remain unmodified.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2016
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?