Robles v. AgReserves, Inc. et al

Filing 73

SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/19/2016. (Kusamura, W)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JUAN CARLOS ROBLES,

9

CASE NO. 1:14-CV-0540 AWI JLT

Plaintiff

10

v.

11

AGRESERVES, INC., et al.,

12
13
14

SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER

Defendant
_____________________________________
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

15
On February 19, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to change the date for filing motions in
16
limine from February 22, 2016 to February 26, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. Additionally, Defendants have
17

requested inclusion of additional exhibits, and represent that Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to the

18
addition. The Court will give effect to the stipulation, and will add the additional exhibits based
19

on defense counsel’s representations.

20
Finally, Plaintiff has filed an objection to the pre-trial order and asks that 62 exhibits be
21
identified and added to the pre-trial order. See Doc. No. 71. The list of 62 exhibits appears to be
22
identical to a list that was provided by Plaintiff on February 12, 2016. Cf. id. with Doc. No. 62. It
23
appears to the Court that the 62 items are already included in the Pre-Trial order. Cf. Docs. 62, 71
24
with Doc. No. 69. If Plaintiff believes that a particular exhibit has been omitted, Plaintiff may file
25
a separate request to modify the pre-trial order and identify the particular exhibit(s) that should be
26
added. For now, and in the absence of particularly identified exhibit(s), the Court will not
27
28

supplement the pre-trial order with respect to Plaintiff’s exhibits.

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

3
4

The deadline for filing motions in limine is RESET from February 22, 2016 to on or by
4:00 p.m. on February 26, 2016;

2.

The following exhibits shall appear under Section VIII(A) of the Pre-Trial Order

5

(Defendants’ List of Exhibits):

6

a.

7

Evaluation Report of Juan Carlos Robles by Dr. Michael E. Kania AGR0014831508;

8

b.

Photographs of Agreserves worksites and geography in general and specifically at:

9

i.

Wasco

10

ii.

Sherwood

11

iii.

Whisler East

12

iv.

Riverside

13

v.

Beech;

14

3.

Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 71) are OVERRULED without prejudice to refiling a

15

particularized request to add exhibits (within the remaining time provided by Pre-Trial

16

Order for filing objections);

17

4.

All other dates, deadlines, and sections of the Pre-Trial Order remain unmodified.

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2016
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2