Hodge v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING defendant to December 14, 2014, to extend her response to plaintiff's confidential letter brief, with all other deadlines extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/18/2014. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, CSBN 189450
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Ste. 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8938
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
) No. 1:14-CV-584-SMS
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
Plaintiff,
) EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
)
Defendant.
_______________________________ )
MICHELLE HODGE,
The parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that the time for
25
Defendant to serve her response to Plaintiff’s confidential letter is extended from
26
November 14, 2014 to December 14, 2014. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling
27
Order are extended accordingly. This is Defendant’s first request for an extension.
28
-1-
1
Defendant requests this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong
2
proceedings unduly. Defendant apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
3
4
Dated: DECEMBER 18, 2015
/s/ Kelsey Brown
(email authorization)
KELSEY BROWN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: DECEMBER 18, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
13
14
15
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
16
17
ORDER
18
19
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
24
DATED: 12/18/2014
/s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?