Shehee v. King
Filing
23
ORDER STRIKING Document for Violation of Informational Order 22 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 03/17/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GREGORY ELL SHEHEE,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
1:14-cv-00590-GSA-PC
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FOR
VIOLATION OF INFORMATIONAL
ORDER
(Doc. 22.)
A. KING, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Gregory Ell Shehee (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with this civil
16
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this
17
action on April 23, 2014. (Doc. 1.)
18
On March 5, 2015, plaintiff filed a document notifying the court that his rights to the
19
court have been denied in multiple cases. (Doc. 22.) The caption of the document contains
20
multiple case numbers and refers to one of Plaintiff‟s other cases titled Shehee vs. Ahlin,
21
indicating that Plaintiff expects the court to consider the same document in multiple cases.
22
(Id.) Plaintiff may not submit documents for multiple cases in this manner. As Plaintiff was
23
informed in the court‟s Informational Order issued on April 24, 2014:
24
25
26
27
28
“If a party has more than one case pending and wants to file the
same document in more than one case, the party must provide a
separate copy of that document, with the correct case number in
the first page caption, for each case. Documents with more than
one case number in the caption may be stricken/returned. . . . A
document which is „stricken‟ will not be considered by the Court
for any purpose.”
(Informational Order, Doc. 3 at 2 ¶II.A, F.)
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff‟s document filed on March 5,
2
2015 in this action is STRICKEN from the record for violation of the court‟s informational
3
order.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 17, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?