Gutierrez v. La Posta Mexican Restaurant Inc., et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time for defendants to respond to complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/23/2014. (Hernandez, M)

5

Lenden F. Webb (SBN 236377)
Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton (SBN 258697)
WEBB & BORDSON
A Professional Corporation
466 W. Fallbrook Ave., Suite 102
Fresno, California 93711
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants SANTOKH SINGH BAINS and JAGDIP K. BRAR

1
2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,
12

Plaintiff,
13

v.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LA POSTA MEXICAN RESTAURANT
INC., a California corporation; SANTOKH
SINGH BAINS; JAGDIP K. BRAR,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-CV-00608-SAB
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS SANTOKH SINGH
BAINS AND JAGDIP K. BRAR TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants
SANTOKH SINGH BAINS and JAGDIP K. BRAR (“Defendants”) stipulated to an extension
of time wherein Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due June 24, 2014;
WHEREAS, Defendants and Plaintiff are engaged in meaningful settlement
negotiations, and wish to avoid incurring additional fees and unnecessarily utilizing judicial
resources while Defendants obtain and share with Plaintiff their CASp report, and while
Plaintiff and Defendants explore, and hopefully finalize, a settlement as between them;
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective
counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

To an additional extension of time (i.e., a second extension which, in

1

total, exceeds 28 days) for Defendants to respond to the Complaint herein, through and

2

including July 22, 2014, which extension exceeds the maximum 28 days permissible without

3

leave of Court.

4
5

Dated: June 20, 2014

WEBB & BORDSON, APC

6
7

By/s/Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton
AMY R. LOVEGREN-TIPTON
Attorney for Defendants

8
9
10
11
12

Dated: June 20, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

13
14

By/s/ Tanya E. Moore_________
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorney for Plaintiff

15
16
17

ORDER

18

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
19
20
21
22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants SANTOKH SINGH BAINS and JAGDIP
K. BRAR’s response to the Complaint herein is now due on or before July 22, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 23, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE