Bonner v. Gipson et al

Filing 26

ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/15: Settlement Conference set for September 11, 2015 at 01:00 PM at Kern Valley State Prison, located at 3000 W. Cecil Avenue, Delano, CA. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM ROY BONNER,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

N. SCAIFE, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Based upon the request of Defendants, the Court sets a settlement conference on September

17
18

) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00610 LJO JLT (PC)
)
) ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
)
) (Doc. 25)
)
)
)
)
)

11, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. at Kern Valley State Prison, located at 3000 W. Cecil Avenue, Delano, CA.
In addition, the Court ORDERS:

19
20

1.

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

21

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority to

22

negotiate and settle the case on any terms1 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a serious

23

matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the procedures

24

the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference:

25
26
27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in
the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party’s most recent
demand.

1

1

a.

No later than August 21, 2015, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant, a

2

written itemization of damages and a meaningful settlement demand which includes a brief

3

explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate;

4

b.

Thereafter, no later than September 4, 2015, Defendants SHALL respond

5

with an acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful2 counteroffer, which includes a brief

6

explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.

7

c.

If settlement is not achieved, the parties SHALL attach copies of their

8

settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below.

9

Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.

10

d.

No later than September 4, 2015, the parties shall submit, directly to Judge

11

Thurston’s chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

12

Conference Statement or by mail to the United States Courthouse, 510 19th Street, Suite 200,

13

Bakersfield, CA 93301. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor

14

served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement

15

Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked “confidential” with the date

16

and time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon;

17

e.

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

18

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case;

19

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

20

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

21

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of

22

the major issues in dispute;

23

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date;

24

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

25
26
27
28

2

“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

2

1

pretrial and trial;

2

E.

The relief sought;

3

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers

4

and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 27, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3