Garcia v. Beard et al

Filing 22

ORDER STRIKING 21 Document as Improperly Filed signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/16/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FELIPE GARCIA,

12
13
14
15

1:14-cv-00625-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT AS
IMPROPERLY FILED
(Doc. 21.)

vs.
JEFFERY A. BEARD, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Felipe Garcia (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

20

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983.

21

Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, requesting initiation of service, requesting appointment of

22

counsel, and requesting the court to intervene in events occurring at the prison. (Doc. 21.)

23

Plaintiff refers to the present case number, and also the case number for another pending case

24

which is assigned to Magistrate Judge Oberto. (Id.)

On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document addressing

25

Plaintiff may not bring a motion for multiple cases in this manner. The court will not

26

consider one motion for multiple cases. As Plaintiff was informed in the court’s Informational

27

Order issued on April 30, 2014, a document meant to be considered in more than one case must

28
1

1

be filed, by separate copies of the document, in each of the cases, using the correct case number

2

for each case. (See Informational Order, Doc. 19 at 2 ¶II.A, F.) The Magistrate Judge assigned

3

to this case is the Honorable Gary S. Austin, not the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto. Here,

4

Plaintiff should file two separate documents, each referring to only one case number,

5

addressing only the case in which the document is to be filed.

6
7

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s document filed on April 8,
2015, is STRICKEN from the record as improperly filed.1

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 16, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

A document which is “stricken” will not be considered by the Court for any purpose.
(Informational Order, Doc. 19 at 2 ¶II.A.)
2