Miles et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/20/2015. Defendant Notartis Pharmaceuticals' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is CONTINUED to 3/30/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
John A. Girardi (State Bar No. 54917)
(jgirardi@girardikeese.com)
GIRARDI KEESE
1126 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90017-1904
Telephone: (213) 977-0211
Facsimile: (213) 481-1554
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Renee Miles and Charles
Miles
6
7
8
9
10
James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880)
jbruen@fbm.com
Sandra A. Edwards (State Bar No. 154578)
sedwards@fbm.com
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 954-4400
Facsimile: (415) 954-4480
11
12
13
14
15
Katharine R. Latimer (admitted pro hac vice)
klatimer@hollingworthllp.com
Martin C. Calhoun (admitted pro hac vice)
mcalhoun@hollingsworthllp.com
HOLLINGSWORTH LLP
1350 I Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 898-5800
Facsimile: (202) 682-1639
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant Novartis
Pharmaceuticals Corporation
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
RENEE MILES and CHARLES MILES,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
25
v.
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PENDING MSJ - No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA
Case No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA
PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON PENDING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
1
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to March 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
5
Dated: January 20, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
PENDING MSJ - No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?