Miles et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Filing 43

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/20/2015. Defendant Notartis Pharmaceuticals' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is CONTINUED to 3/30/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 John A. Girardi (State Bar No. 54917) (jgirardi@girardikeese.com) GIRARDI KEESE 1126 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90017-1904 Telephone: (213) 977-0211 Facsimile: (213) 481-1554 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Renee Miles and Charles Miles 6 7 8 9 10 James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880) jbruen@fbm.com Sandra A. Edwards (State Bar No. 154578) sedwards@fbm.com FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 11 12 13 14 15 Katharine R. Latimer (admitted pro hac vice) klatimer@hollingworthllp.com Martin C. Calhoun (admitted pro hac vice) mcalhoun@hollingsworthllp.com HOLLINGSWORTH LLP 1350 I Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 898-5800 Facsimile: (202) 682-1639 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 RENEE MILES and CHARLES MILES, Plaintiffs, 22 23 24 25 v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. 26 27 28 STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PENDING MSJ - No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA Case No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 1 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to March 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. 5 Dated: January 20, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PENDING MSJ - No. 1:14-cv-00667-GEB-GSA -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?