Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. Trumbly et al

Filing 173

ORDER vacating Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing and Trial Dates to be rescheduled, if necessary, after resolution of the pending Motion for Summary Judgment 158 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/28/2020. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 REDDING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ( Doc. No. 158) On August 14, 2019, the Court issued the second scheduling order setting the case for jury trial on April 7, 2020, and a telephonic trial confirmation hearing on February 3, 2020. On October 8, 2019, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to amend the scheduling order and 21 22 ORDER VACATING TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING AND TRIAL DATES TO BE RESCHEDULED, IF NECESSARY, AFTER RESOLUTION OF THE PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 20 Case No.: 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB (PC) At the time this action was filed, Plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee proceeding 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) extended the deadline to file a dispositive motion to December 16, 2019. (Doc. No. 169.) On December 13, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 170.) 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 In light of the fact that Defendants’ have filed a motion for summary judgment which is 1 2 pending before the Court and may resolve some (or all) of the claims in the instant action, the Court 3 HEREBY VACATES the telephonic trial confirmation hearing set for February 3, 2020 and the jury 4 trial set for April 7, 2020, to be rescheduled, if necessary, after resolution of Defendants’ motion for 5 summary judgment. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 January 28, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?