Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. Trumbly et al
Filing
85
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 84 Notice filed April 3, 2017 and GRANTING Plaintiff Thirty Days to File an Amended Complaint in Compliance with the Court's March 16, 2017, Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/04/17. ( Amended Complaint : 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY ELL SHEHEE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
REDDING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE
FILED APRIL 3, 2017, AND GRANTING
PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT IN COMPLIANCE
WITH THE COURT’S MARCH 16, 2017, ORDER
[ECF No. 84]
At the time this action was filed, Plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee proceeding
17
18
pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California
19
Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the
20
meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).
On April 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice to the Court indicating that on March 7, 2017, all of
21
22
his legal property was taken. Inasmuch as Plaintiff is in need of an extension of time to file an
23
amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s March 16, 2017, order, the Court will grant a thirty
24
day extension. However, Plaintiff is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted, absent
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
a showing of extraordinary circumstances supported by factual details, not present here. Accordingly,
2
it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this
3
order to file an amended complaint.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
April 4, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?