Fishman v. State of California et al
Filing
3
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay $50.00 Balance of Filing Fee within 30 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/15/2014. Motion for IFP due by 6/16/2014. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UDI FISHMAN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
1:14-cv-00708-GSA-PC
ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY $50.00 BALANCE OF FILING
FEE, WITHIN 30 DAYS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Udi Fishman (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
20
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on May 12,
21
2014. (Doc. 1.)
22
Plaintiff has paid $350.00 of the $400.00 filing fee. (Court Record.) Plaintiff must
23
either pay the remaining $50.00 balance of the filing fee, or submit an application to proceed in
24
forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of
26
service of this order, Plaintiff shall either submit the attached application to proceed in forma
27
pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, pay the remaining $50.00 balance of the
28
1
1
filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be granted without a showing of
2
good cause.
3
If Plaintiff chooses to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also
4
submit a certified copy of his prison trust statement for the six month period immediately
5
preceding the filing of the complaint, within sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order.
6
Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 15, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?