Staten v. Gipson et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING Action for Plaintiff's Failure to Pay Filing Fee; Clerk ot Close Case, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/17/14. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DWIGHT A. STATEN, Case No. 1:14-cv-00718-LJO-MJS (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE (ECF No. 14) 15 GIPSON, et al., 16 17 CLERK TO CLOSE CASE Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed May 12, 2014 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 On June 30, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations 22 (ECF No. 6) that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application should be denied because he 23 accrued three or more strikes and was not under imminent danger of serious physical harm 24 at the time the action was initiated, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that Plaintiff should be 25 provided with the opportunity to pay the filing fee in full. 26 On October 20, 2014, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations, 27 and ordered Plaintiff to submit the $400 filing fee, in full, within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 28 14). Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of 1 1 this action. (Id.) Local Rule 110. The twenty-one day period has passed, and Plaintiff has 2 not submitted the filing fee. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without 4 prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 110 for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The Clerk is 5 directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill November 17, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?