Fernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER on Stipulation of Dismissal (Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/16/15: This action is dismissed, in its entirety, without prejudice. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00723-SKO ) ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MARTIN FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 15 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through 18 their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1), as 19 follows: 20 1. This action was commenced on May 12, 2014. 21 2. The action is not a class action; a receiver has not been appointed; and the action is not 22 governed by any statute of the United States that requires an order of the court for 23 dismissal. 24 3. This action is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, without prejudice. 25 26 Dated: March 6, 2015 27 Respectfully submitted, /s__Jonathan Omar Pena__ JONATHAN OMAR PENA Attorney for Plaintiff 28 Stip. Of Dismissal 1:14-cv-00723-SKO 1 1 Dated: March 6, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 2 3 4 5 By: 6 7 (As authorized via email) _____________________ Francesco Paulo Benavides Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 ORDER 10 11 12 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 16, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. Of Dismissal 1:14-cv-00723-SKO 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?