Syed v. M-I, LLC et al
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/15/2017: The Court is in receipt of the parties' 98 Joint Status Report dated 8/14/2017. In light of the parties' agreement, the court hereby ORDERS that this case be STAYED pending r esolution of M-I's Supreme Court petition. The status conference set for 8/21/2017 is hereby RESET for 10/23/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. The parties shall file a joint status report by 10/16/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
13
SARMAD SYED, an individual,
on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
16
17
18
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
14
15
CIV. NO. 1:14-742 WBS BAM
v.
M-I LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liablity Company; PRECHECK,
INC., a Texas Corporation;
and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
19
20
----oo0oo----
21
The court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Status
22
23
Report dated August 14, 2017.
24
previously stayed the case until August 21, 2017 based on the
25
agreement of the parties at the status conference held on May 8,
26
2017.
27
filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States
(Docket No. 97).
(Docket No. 98).
The court
Defendant M-I, LLC (“M-I”) has since
28
1
1
Supreme Court, and the parties jointly request a further stay of
2
proceedings until the Supreme Court rules on the petition.
3
In light of the parties’ agreement, the court hereby
4
ORDERS that this case be stayed pending resolution of M-I’s
5
Supreme Court petition.
6
2017 is hereby RESET for October 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. in
7
Courtroom 5.
8
October 16, 2017.
9
10
The status conference set for August 21,
The parties shall file a joint status report by
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 15, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?