Syed v. M-I, LLC et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/15/2017: The Court is in receipt of the parties' 98 Joint Status Report dated 8/14/2017. In light of the parties' agreement, the court hereby ORDERS that this case be STAYED pending r esolution of M-I's Supreme Court petition. The status conference set for 8/21/2017 is hereby RESET for 10/23/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. The parties shall file a joint status report by 10/16/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 SARMAD SYED, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 16 17 18 ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 15 CIV. NO. 1:14-742 WBS BAM v. M-I LLC, a Delaware Limited Liablity Company; PRECHECK, INC., a Texas Corporation; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 The court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Status 22 23 Report dated August 14, 2017. 24 previously stayed the case until August 21, 2017 based on the 25 agreement of the parties at the status conference held on May 8, 26 2017. 27 filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States (Docket No. 97). (Docket No. 98). The court Defendant M-I, LLC (“M-I”) has since 28 1 1 Supreme Court, and the parties jointly request a further stay of 2 proceedings until the Supreme Court rules on the petition. 3 In light of the parties’ agreement, the court hereby 4 ORDERS that this case be stayed pending resolution of M-I’s 5 Supreme Court petition. 6 2017 is hereby RESET for October 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. in 7 Courtroom 5. 8 October 16, 2017. 9 10 The status conference set for August 21, The parties shall file a joint status report by IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 15, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?