Briones v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al

Filing 46

NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust/ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/22/16. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHNNY G. BRIONES,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
vs.

1:14-cv-00750-LJO-EPG-PC
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON,
(ECF No. 45.)
et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

Johnny G. Briones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

20

pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2016,

21

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to exhaust

22

administrative remedies. (ECF No. 45.)

23

Defendants have not provided Plaintiff with the requisite Notice and Warning, pursuant

24

to the Ninth Circuit’s requirement in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), informing

25

Plaintiff of his rights and responsibilities in opposing Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure

26

to exhaust. Therefore, the Court shall, by this order, provide Plaintiff with the requisite Notice

27

and Warning. Defendants are advised that in the future they should routinely provide a Notice

28

and Warning to a pro se plaintiff in a prisoner case when bringing a motion to dismiss or
1

1

motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing

2

suit. Woods 684 F.3d at 940 (Counsel for defendants in prisoner civil rights cases should

3

include in any motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment in a case where the

4

plaintiff is not assisted by counsel a short and plain statement of the requirements needed to

5

defeat a defendant's dispositive motion.)

6
7

NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

8

Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), the Court now hereby

9

notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing Defendants’ motion to

10

dismiss for failure to exhaust. Woods, 684 F.3d 934 (Fair notice of the requirements needed to

11

defeat a defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies must be

12

provided to a pro se prisoner litigant in a civil rights case.)

13

NOTICE AND WARNING:

14

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

15

administrative remedies as to one or more claims in the complaint. The

16

failure to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to a motion for

17

summary judgment or, if a failure to exhaust is clear on the face of the

18

complaint, a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Albino v. Baca, 747

19

F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014). “The motion to dismiss for failure to

20

exhaust administrative remedies is similar to a motion for a summary

21

judgment in that the district court will consider materials beyond the

22

pleadings; the plaintiff has a ‘right to file counter-affidavits or other

23

responsive evidentiary materials.’” Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008

24

(9th Cir. 2012), quoting Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th Cir. 1998).

25

If the Court determines that all of the claims are unexhausted, the

26

case will be dismissed, which means Plaintiff=s case is over. If some of the

27

claims are exhausted and some are unexhausted, the unexhausted claims

28

will be dismissed and the case will proceed forward only on the exhausted
2

1

claims. Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 219-224, 127 S. Ct. 910, 923-26 (2007).

2

A dismissal for failure to exhaust is without prejudice. Id.

3

Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss shall be briefed

4

pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a

5

statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Local Rule

6

230(l).

7

opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for

8

failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be

9

filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id.

If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non-

10

If responding to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

11

administrative remedies, Plaintiff may not simply rely on allegations in the

12

complaint.

13

specific facts in declaration(s) and/or by submitting other evidence

14

regarding the exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

15

43(c). Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed

16

under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. If Plaintiff does not

17

submit his own evidence in opposition, the Court may conclude that

18

Plaintiff has not exhausted the administrative remedies and the case will be

19

dismissed in whole or in part.

Instead, Plaintiff must oppose the motion by setting forth

20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 22, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
3