Tennento v. Boston et al

Filing 24

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/14/2015. Consent/Decline Deadline 4/24/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 7/13/2015. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 5/20/2015; Non-Expert 4/15/2016; Expert 7/1/2016. Mid -Discovery Status Conference set for 11/12/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 7/18/2016; Hearing by 8/15/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadli nes: Filed by 8/30/2016; Hearing by 10/11/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 1/31/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

TONY TENNENTO,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

CHRISTOPHER BOSTON, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00772 LJO JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 7/13/2015
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 5/20/2015
Non-Expert: 4/15/2016
Expert: 7/1/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
11/12/2015 at 9:00 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/18/2016
Hearing: 8/15/2016

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/30/2016
Hearing: 10/11/2016

20
21
22

Pre-Trial Conference:
12/6/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

23
24

Trial:

25
26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
April 13, 2015
1

1/31/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 5 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Plaintiff appeared in pro per.

3

Judith Denny appeared on behalf of Defendants.

4

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

5

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

6

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

7

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

8

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

9

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

10

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

11
12

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

13

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

14

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

16

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

17
18

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

19

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

20

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

21

District of California.
Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (Doc. 22 at 18). Therefore, Defendants

22
23

are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all further proceedings,

24

including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel SHALL file a consent/decline form

25

(provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating whether they will consent to the

26

jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

27

IV.

28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2

1

motion to amend, no later than July 13, 2015.

2

V.

3
4
5
6

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before May 20, 2015.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before April
15, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before July 1, 2016.

7

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before May 6, 2016,

8

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before June 3, 2016. The written designation of retained and

9

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

10

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

11

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

12

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

13

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

14

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

15

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

16

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

17
18
19

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for November 12, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the

20

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

21

California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed

22

by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall

23

be e-mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

24

discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

25

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via

26

CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk

27
1

28

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health
evaluation, the examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s
report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.

3

1

no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

2

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

3
4

than July 18, 2016, and heard on or before August 15, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are heard before

5

the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

6

Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

7
8

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

9

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

10

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

11

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

12

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

13

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

14

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

15

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

16
17

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

18

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

19
20

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

21

before the noticed hearing date.

22

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than August 30, 2016, and heard no later

23

than October 11, 2016, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

24

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

25

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

26

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

27

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

28

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
4

1

to be raised in the motion.

2

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

3

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

4

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

5

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

6

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.

7

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

8

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

9

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

10

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the

11

joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

12
13

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

14

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

15

December 6, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

16

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

17

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

18

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

19
20

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

21

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

22

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

23

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

24

IX.

25
26

Trial Date
January 31, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

United States District Court Judge.

27

A.

This is a jury trial.

28

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5 days.
5

C.

1

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California, Rule 285.

3

X.

Settlement Conference
Defendants are not interested in participating in a settlement conference. Thus, one is not set at

4
5

this time. However, if in the future, the parties agree a settlement conference is likely to be fruitful,

6

they may file a stipulation requesting a settlement conference be placed on calendar.

7

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

8

Techniques to Shorten Trial

9

Not applicable at this time.

10
11
12
13

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

14

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

15

amendments thereto. The Court insists upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

16

significant case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided in both

17

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

18

California.

19

XIV. Effect of this Order

20

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

21

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

22

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

23

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

24

subsequent status conference.

25

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

26

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

27

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

28

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
6

1
2

for granting the relief requested.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 14, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7