Henry v. Cate et al
Filing
68
ORDER ADOPTING 58 & 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 56 & 57 Plaintiff's Motions Seeking Court Intervention, For Lack of Jurisdiction signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/31/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KENNETH R. HENRY,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00791-LJO-SKO (PC)
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS SEEKING COURT INTERVENTION
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
CATE, et al.,
13
(Docs. 56-59)
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff, Kenneth R. Henry, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
16
this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
17
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
18
On February 1, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed two Findings and Recommendations to
19
deny Plaintiff’s motions seeking court intervention regarding his housing, which were served on
20
the parties and contained notice that objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be
21
filed within thirty days. Neither side filed any objections. Local Rule 304(b), (d).
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a
23
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
24
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 1, 2016 (Docs. 58, 59), are
27
adopted in full; and
28
1
1
2.
2
Plaintiff’s motions, filed on January 28, 2016 (Docs. 56, 57) requesting court
intervention regarding where he is housed, are denied for lack of jurisdiction.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
March 31, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?