Sanchez v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 13

Order Re: Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time To File Supplemental Motion For Preliminary Approval. The Motion Hearing is now set for May 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/17/2015. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ELIAZAR SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Class Action Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. 1:14-CV-00797-AWI-MJS v. FRITO-LAY, INC.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Before the Hon. Judge Seng Trial Date: June 21, 2016 Complaint Filed: April 11, 2014 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:436440732.1 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 1 FINDING THAT GOOD CAUSE EXISTS, IT IS HEREBY 2 ORDERED THAT, the date by which to file the Supplemental Motion for Order 3 Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, currently calendared for 4 February 23, 2015, is extended. Plaintiff shall file his Supplemental Motion for Order 5 Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, on or before March 9, 2015, 6 by close of business. The Hearing on Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion For Order 7 8 Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall be continued from March 13, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. to May 1, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: February 17, 2015 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:436440732.1 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?