Sanchez v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULED HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; Hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is set for 7/17/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/17/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ELIAZAR SANCHEZ, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00797-DAD-MJS
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULED HEARING
ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Preliminary Approval of Class
Action Settlement: July 17, 2018 at
9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 5 (DAD)
Good cause appearing, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval
of Class Action Settlement, currently set for January 12, 2018, is continued until July 17,
2018, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 5, Fresno. Plaintiff shall file his Motion for Preliminary
Approval no later than twenty-eight (28) days prior to that hearing.
This continuance is granted: 1) to give Plaintiff an opportunity to thoroughly
reexamine, reevaluate and, if and as necessary, renegotiate the proposed terms of
settlement of the claims of the class; and, 2) to give Plaintiff one final opportunity to
submit a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement that complies with
applicable law and rules and is supported by law, facts, evidence and logic, all of which
must be clearly, competently and persuasively presented to the Court in the Motion for
Preliminary Approval. Another failure to present a proper such motion likely will result in
denial of class certification and leave Plaintiff with no option but to pursue the action
solely on his own behalf or dismiss it entirely.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 17, 2017
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?