Furnace v. Gipson et al

Filing 74

ORDER Extending Date for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/13/2017. (Case Management Deadline: 4/3/2017) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EDWARD T. FURNACE, 1:14-cv-0814-LJO-MJS (PC) 13 Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS 14 v. 15 16 (ECF No. 73) CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 20 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 Under the Stipulation and Order entered by the Court on February 1, 2017 (ECF 22 No. 71), Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s various sets of discovery are currently due 23 on March 13, 2017. 24 On March 6, 2017, the parties met and conferred regarding Plaintiff’s settlement 25 demand and Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. During the 26 discussion, the parties stipulated to an extension of twenty-one days from March 13, 27 2017 for Defendants to respond to all discovery items propounded by Plaintiff. (ECF No. 28 73.) 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to parties’ stipulation, 2 Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests must be served on Plaintiff on or 3 before April 3, 2017. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 13, 2017 /s/ 7 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?