Richard Villapando v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Filing
48
ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Clarification; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/26/15. Amended Complaint due by 7/6/2015. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
RICHARD VILLAPANDO,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
CDCR,
16
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14cv00823 LJO DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
(Document 47)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME
(Document 46)
17
18
19
Plaintiff Richard Villapando (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prison inmate proceeding
pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
On May 7, 2015, the Court issued an order declining to adopt the February 23, 2015,
21
Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days from the date of service of
22
23
the order within which to file an amended complaint.
On May 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification of the order, as well as a
24
25
request for an extension of time.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
4
Plaintiff is informed that he will not need to serve his amended complaint on Defendant.
Additionally, for good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion for additional time is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint by July 6, 2015. As this is a large extension of time,
further extensions will not be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
May 26, 2015
/s/ Dennis
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?