D.L. v. Vassilev et al

Filing 76

ORDER Regarding Dismissal of Defendants Pavel Mundl, MD and Rodolfo Vicente, MD, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/4/19. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
Dennis R. Thelen, SBN 83999 Kevin E. Thelen, SBN 252665 1 LAW OFFICES OF 2 LEBEAU • THELEN, LLP 5001 East Commercenter Drive, Suite 300 Post Office Box 12092 Bakersfield, California 93389-2092 (661) 325-8962; Fax (661) 325-1127 (dthelen@lebeauthelen.com) (kthelen@lebeauthelen.com) 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare, Pavel Mundl, M.D., and Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 D.L. Case No.: 1:14-CV-00824-AWI-BAM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PAVEL MUNDL, M.D. AND RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D. MARGARET VASSILEV, M.D.; RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D.; MARK WISEMAN, M.D.; PAVEL MUNDL, M.D.; COUNTY OF TULARE; KAWEAH DELTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT; SANDRA BOSMAN, M.D.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LORI ANN M. BOKEN, M.D.; T. PLUNKETT, RNC; D. BRACKETT, RNC; B. BROWN, RNFA; and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants. 21 22 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD: 23 Plaintiff D.L., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Kari Ann Junio, and through his 24 counsel of record Mark Wade Coleman, Esq., and defendants Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, 25 M.D., through their counsel of record Kevin E. Thelen, Esq., hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss 26 defendants Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, M.D., with prejudice, from the above-captioned 27 action in exchange for a waiver of costs. 28 {00225044;1} -1STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PAVEL MUNDL, M.D. AND RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D. 1 This agreement between the parties was reached following arms-length negotiations about a 2 potential resolution to the case between counsel for plaintiff and counsel for Dr. Mundl and Dr. Vicente. 3 This dismissal of Dr. Mundl and Dr. Vicente shall be effective immediately upon the execution 4 of the enclosed Proposed Order filed herein with the Court. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 Date: March 1, 2019 NUTTALL COLEMAN & DRANDELL 8 By: 9 10 11 /s/ Mark W. Coleman ___________________________________ MARK W. COLEMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for plaintiff D.L., by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Kari Ann Junio 12 13 Dated: March 1, 2019 14 LeBEAU-THELEN, LLP By: 15 16 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /s/ KEVIN E. THELEN_______________ DENNIS R. THELEN, ESQ. KEVIN E. THELEN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE, PAVEL MUNDL, M.D., AND RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D. /// 28 {00225044;1} -2STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PAVEL MUNDL, M.D. AND RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D. 1 ORDER 2 The parties have stipulated that the action brought by Plaintiff D.L., a minor, by and through his 3 Guardian Ad Litem, Kari Ann Junio, against Defendants Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, M.D. 4 be dismissed with prejudice in exchange for a waiver of costs. In light of the parties’ stipulation, 5 Plaintiff’s action against Defendants Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, M.D. only is terminated 6 by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The motions 7 for summary judgment currently set for hearing on March 15, 2018 (Doc. Nos. 72, 73), and all other 8 pending dates and matters pertaining to Defendants Rodolfo Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, M.D., are 9 VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket by terminating Defendants Rodolfo 10 Vicente, M.D. and Pavel Mundl, M.D. and not close this action. 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara March 4, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00225044;1} -3STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PAVEL MUNDL, M.D. AND RODOLFO VICENTE, M.D.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?