Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, et al v. Centex Homes, et al

Filing 59

ORDER on Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines Set in Initial Scheduling Order re 58 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/15/2015. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. (SBN 192390)
Raymond E. Brown, Esq. (SBN 164819)
Jason Y. Chao, Esq. (SBN 250735)
Angela N. Martin, Esq. (SBN 238426)
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
T: 714-384-6600 / F: 714-384-6601
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Iowa corporation; and
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation
Plaintiffs,
v.

19
20
21

CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general
partnership, CENTEX REAL ESTATE
CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; and
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

22
23

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:14-cv-00826-LGO-GSA
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF No. 58)

24
25
26
27
28

1

CASE NO: 1:14−CV−00826−LJO−GSA
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER

1

After a review of the Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines filed by the parties (ECF No. 58)

2

and the procedural posture of this case, the Court finds good cause to continue the date set for the

3

Non-expert Discovery Cutoff in the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order (ECF No. 51) from

4

November 4, 2015 to December 21, 2015.

5

However, based on the pending discovery motions in this action and the procedural posture

6

of the cases related to this action, the Court does not find good cause to continue the other dates in

7

the Scheduling Order as requested in the Stipulation. All other deadlines in the Scheduling Order

8

will therefore remain as previously set.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 15, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

CASE NO: 1:14−CV−00826−LJO−GSA
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER