Wiseman v. Cate, et al.
Filing
84
ORDER After Notice of all parties acceptance of Mediator's proposal signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/12/2019. Dispositional Documents due by 5/3/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHESTER RAY WISEMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01166-AWI-JLT (PC)
ORDER AFTER NOTICE OF ALL PARTIES
ACCEPTANCE OF MEDIATOR’S PROPOSAL
J. GONZALEZ,
15
Defendant.
16
_____________________________________
17
CHESTER RAY WISEMAN,
18
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00831-DAD-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
MARTIN BITER,
21
Defendant.
22
_____________________________________
23
CHESTER RAY WISEMAN,
24
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00126-LJO-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
MARTIN BITER,
27
Defendant.
28
1
1
On January 28, 2019, after the settlement conference failed to yield a compromise, the Court
2
issued a mediator’s proposal (Doc. 43). The parties have all indicated they will accept the mediator’s
3
proposal without qualification. This constitutes settlement of cases Wiseman v. Gonzalez, Case No.:
4
1:17-cv-01166 AWI JLT, Wiseman v. Biter, Case No.: 1:14-cv-00831 DAD SAB (including both the
5
trial level matter and the appeal) (Biter I) and Wiseman v. Biter, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00126 LJO SAB
6
(Biter II). Consequently, the Court ORDERS:
7
1.
Defense counsel SHALL provide the settlement documents the plaintiff no later than
8
March 15, 2019;
9
2.
The stipulation to dismiss the action SHALL be filed no later than May 3, 2019;
10
3.
All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED.
11
The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing
12
sanctions, including the dismissal of the action.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 12, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?