Byrd v. Pennywell, et al.

Filing 8

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/17/2015. Show Cause Response due by 8/3/2015.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CURTIS EDWARD BYRD,

12

Plaintiff,

13

Case No. 1:14-cv-00832 DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

14

SANDRA PENNYWELL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Curtis Edward Byrd, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

17
18

pauperis, filed this civil rights action on June 2, 2014.
On June 5, 2015, the Court screened the complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a

19
20

claim. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. Over thirty days have passed

21

and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court.

22

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be

23

dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. Plaintiff shall file a response to this order within

24

fourteen (14) days of the date of service. A response to this order may be made by filing a First

25

Amended Complaint.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

Failure to show cause, or failure to respond to this order, will result in dismissal of this
action.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
Dated:
6

/s/ Dennis

July 17, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2