Kaur v. United States of America et al

Filing 19

ORDER CLOSING THE MATTER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KARAMJIT KAUR,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14
15

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.

16

) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00839- JLT
)
) ORDER CLOSING THE MATTER
)
) (Doc. 18)
)
)
)
)
)

17
On September 11, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss the action. (Doc. 18)

18
19

The stipulation relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff

20

may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing

21

party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal

22

signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been

23

filed, an order of the Court is not required to effectuate the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii);

24

Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

2

1.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal
with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 14, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2