Shaw v. Black Bear Diner-Tulare L.P., et al.

Filing 20

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION with prejudice; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/26/2015. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CECIL SHAW,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
BLACK BEAR DINER-TULARE L.P. dba
BLACK BEAR DINER, et al.,
Defendants.

) No. 1:14-cv-00849-GSA
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants

2

Black Bear Diner-Tulare, L.P. dba Black Bear Diner, Roger Elmerick, and Christine Elmerick,

3

the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule

4

of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

5

entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

6

Date: January 23, 2015

7

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cecil Shaw

8
9
10

MULLEN & HENZELL L.L.P.

11

/s/ Rafael Gonzalez
Rafael Gonzalez
Attorneys for Defendants
Black Bear Diner-Tulare, L.P. dba Black Bear
Diner, Roger Elmerick, and Christine Elmerick

12
13
14
15

ORDER

16
17
18
19

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 26, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2