MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. v. Apex Directional Drilling, LLC

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/14 re: 21 ORDERING that: i) the parties may postpone preparation of the required Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report until a time after the Court decides Apex's pending motion to dismiss; and, ii) should the Court deny Apex's motion to dismiss, the parties shall file their joint status report no later than sixty (60) days after the Court's ruling on the motion to dismiss. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 5 David A. Rabbino, CA State Bar #182291 Direct Dial: 503.802.2144 Direct Fax: 503.972.3844 Email: david.rabbino@tonkon.com TONKON TORP LLP 1600 Pioneer Tower 888 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-2099 6 Attorneys for Defendant Apex Directional Drilling, LLC 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. APEX DIRECTIONAL DRILLING, LLC, 15 Case No. 1:14−CV−00857−JAM-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Defendant Apex Directional Drilling, LLC, and Plaintiff MP Nexlevel of California, Inc through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to Judge Mendez's Order, Dkt. 16, the parties are required to meet and 20 confer within 60 days of the service of the complaint as required by Rule 26(f) to prepare and 21 submit to the Court a joint status report and discovery plan. 22 2. Defendant Apex has filed a motion to dismiss, presently set for hearing on 23 September 17, 2014 (Dkt. 18). The parties have met and conferred, and agree that postponing the 24 Rule 26(f) conference and preparation of the required joint status report until after the Court rules 25 on the pending motion is in their collective interest and would save time and resources. 26 3. If Apex's motion is denied, the parties request that the Court schedule the 27 Mandatory Scheduling Conference no sooner than sixty (60) days after issuing its decision, and 28 the parties agree they will then proceed to conduct the required meet and confer and would have -1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE CASE NO.: 1:14−CV−00857−JAM-BAM 1242594v.1 1 2 the required joint status report and discovery plan prepared in advance of the status conference. 4. Therefore, Apex and MP Nexlevel hereby stipulate, and request that the Court 3 order that: i) the parties may postpone preparation of the required Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report 4 until a time after the Court decides Apex's pending motion to dismiss; and, ii) should the Court 5 deny Apex's motion to dismiss, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference be rescheduled for a date 6 ideally no earlier than sixty (60) days after the Court's ruling. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED 9 10 Dated: August 29, 2014 TONKON TORP, LLP 11 12 /s/ David Rabbino_____________________ David Rabbino, Esq. (SBN 181291) Attorneys for Defendant APEX DIRECTIONAL DRILLING, LLC 13 14 15 16 Dated: Authorized August 29, 2014 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 17 /s/ Ben Patrick Ben Patrick, Esq. (SBN 244092) Attorneys for Plaintiff MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1242594v.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER The foregoing Stipulation of the parties is hereby approved, and pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: i) the parties may postpone preparation of the required Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report until a time after the Court decides Apex's pending motion to dismiss; and, ii) should the Court deny Apex's motion to dismiss, the parties shall file their joint status report no later than sixty (60) days after the Court's ruling on the motion to dismiss. 8 9 BY THE COURT: 10 11 Dated: 8/29/2014 12 13 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 14 035940/00017/5851109v1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1242594v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?