Oden v. State of California, et al.
Filing
45
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' 42 MOTION to DISMISS, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/16/2017. (Case Management Deadline: 21-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DERRICK JESUS ODEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:14-cv-00873-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
(ECF No. 42)
15
Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
16
17
18
Plaintiff Derrick Jesus Oden (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently
20
proceeds on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint against Defendants Acebedo, Swaim, and
21
Thomas (“Defendants”) for deliberate indifference to a serious risk in violation of the Eighth
22
Amendment.
23
On October 16, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s third amended
24
complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which
25
relief can be granted. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before November 9,
26
2017. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
27
28
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a
statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is
1
1
warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with
2
prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 16, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?