Wilson v. Conair Corporation

Filing 56

ORDER VACATING plaintiff's Motion to Compel, document 51 , currently noticed for hearing on 8/12/2015 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, as the Court has deemed the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Ru le 230(g). The Court further directs plaintiff to file a response by noon, 8/14/2015, to defendant's opposition but, only as to the allegation that the Joint Statement filed August 5, 2015, was not a joint statement. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/11/2015. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 DELIA WILSON, Case No. 1:14 -cv-00894-WBS-SAB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING AUGUST 12, 2015 HEARING and REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION FILED AUGUST 10, 2015 REGARDING THE JOINT STATEMENT ALLEGATION 6 v. 7 CONAIR CORPORATION, 8 Defendant. 9 10 11 12 On July 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 51.) A purported Joint Statement was filed on August 5, 2015 and Defendant filed an opposition on August 10, 2015. (ECF Nos. 52, 55.) 13 14 15 The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). The previously scheduled hearing set on August 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. is vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. 16 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response by noon, Friday, August 14, 2015 to Defendant’s Opposition but only to the allegation that the Joint Statements filed August 5, 2015 was not a joint statement. If after receipt of Plaintiff’s response, the Court requires a hearing it will set a hearing whereby both parties can personally attend. Defendant need not file a reply. After the filing of Plaintiff’s response, the matter will be deemed submitted. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: August 11, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?