Weatherington v. Rios et al

Filing 20

ORDER VACATING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Action for Failure to State a Claim for Relief signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/16/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTE WEATHERINGTON, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:14-cv-0906 AWI DLB PC ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF S. RIOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Monte Weatherington, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on June 12, 2014. On March 16, 2015, the Court screened the 19 complaint and determined Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim under the Fourth Amendment against 20 Defendant Arranquin. The Court found no other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was given the option to 21 proceed on his cognizable claim or file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff elected to file 22 a FAC and did so on June 1, 2015. 23 On April 27, 2016, the Court screened the complaint and found it failed to state a cognizable 24 claim for relief. Plaintiff was directed to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days. Over 25 thirty days passed and Plaintiff failed to comply. Accordingly, on June 2, 2016, the Court issued a 26 Findings and Recommendation which recommended the action be dismissed for failure to state a 27 claim for relief. 28 1 1 2 On June 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. In light of this filing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation issued June 2, 2016, is VACATED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 /s/ Dennis June 16, 2016 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?