McClure v. Chen, et al.

Filing 103

ORDER directing Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Void the Settlement Agreement 100 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/10/2020. (Response due within seven (7) Days.) (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GEORGE MCCLURE, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. C.K. CHEN, 11 Defendant. 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00932-DAD-GSA (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VOID THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [ECF No. 100] On June 7, 2019, the undersigned held a settlement conference with the parties, and the case 13 14 settled with the terms placed on the record. On June 17, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for 15 voluntary dismissal, the case was closed on June 18, 2019. (ECF Nos. 98,99.) On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to void the settlement agreement. (ECF No. 100.) 16 17 The Court finds a response by Defendant is necessary to fully address Plaintiff’s motion which 18 includes a claim that he was offered $10,000 prior to the settlement conference. The matter was 19 referred to the undersigned by the assigned judge on January 10, 2020, since this Court handled the 20 settlement matter. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s 21 22 motion within seven (7) days from the date of service of this order. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: 26 January 10, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?