McClure v. Chen, et al.
Filing
70
ORDER LIFTING STAY of Discovery; New Discovery and Scheduling ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/13/2018. New Discovery Deadline: January 14, 2019; New Dispositive Motions Filing Deadline: March 14, 2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GEORGE MCCLURE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:14-cv-00932-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY
(ECF No. 36.)
v.
C. K. CHEN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
NEW DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
New Discovery Deadline:
January 14, 2019
New Dispositive Motions Filing Deadline: March 14, 2019
17
18
George McClure (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
19
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
20
commencing this action on June 4, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s
21
First Amended Complaint, filed on February 9, 2015, against defendants Chen and Horton, on
22
Plaintiff’s medical claim under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 12.)
23
24
On January 19, 2016, the court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order, opening
discovery and setting out deadlines. (ECF No. 22.)
25
On March 25, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 28.)
26
On May 11, 2016, the court issued an order staying discovery pending resolution of the motion.
27
(ECF No. 36.) On March 28, 2017, the court denied Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
28
(ECF No. 46.)
1
1
On April 18, 2017, Defendants filed a second motion for summary judgment. (ECF No.
2
47.) On September 11, 2018, the court denied the motion and referred the matter back to the
3
undersigned for the issuance of a scheduling order setting new deadlines for discovery and the
4
filing of dispositive motions. (ECF No. 69.) Therefore, by this order, the court lifts the stay of
5
discovery and issues a new Discovery and Scheduling Order. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
6
Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows:
7
I.
WRITTEN DISCOVERY 1
8
Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
9
Procedure 5 and Rule 135 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court,
10
Eastern District of California (Local Rules), and shall only be filed when required by Local Rules
11
250.2, 250.3, and 250.4.
12
The parties are limited to 25 interrogatories as described by Federal Rule of Civil
13
Procedure 33, 25 requests for admission made according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36,
14
and 25 requests to produce made according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34.
15
Responses to document requests shall include all documents within a party's possession,
16
custody, or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents are deemed within a party's possession,
17
custody, or control if the party has actual possession, custody, or control thereof, or the legal
18
right to obtain the property on demand. Allen v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309945, *2 (E.D. Cal.
19
2007.)2
20
Responses to written discovery requests shall be due 30 calendar days after the request
21
is served. All discovery requests must be served at least 60 calendar days before the discovery
22
deadline. All motions to compel must be filed on or before the discovery deadline. The parties
23
are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the failure to do so may result
24
///
25
26
1
27
2
28
Nothing in this order is meant to expand Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
Defendants' responses should be consistent with their right to request documents pursuant to California
Government Code §3306.5. ("Each employer shall keep each public safety officer's personnel file or a true and
correct copy thereof, and shall make the file or copy thereof available within a reasonable period of time after a
request thereof by the officer.")
2
1
in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other
2
appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Local Rules.
3
If any party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, he/she shall provide a
4
privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date, author, recipients, general subject
5
matter, and basis of the privilege within 15 calendar days after the date the response is due.
6
Failure to provide a privilege log within this time shall result in a waiver of the privilege.
7
If disputes arise about a party's obligation to respond to written requests for discovery,
8
the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5, 7,
9
11, 26, and 37 and Local Rules 110, 130, 131, 133, 135, 142, 144, and 230(l). However, unless
10
otherwise ordered, Local Rule 251 and the requirements set forth in Federal Rules of Civil
11
Procedure 26 and 37− that a party certify he/she has conferred in good faith or attempted to confer
12
with the opponent in an effort to resolve the dispute prior to seeking court action − shall not
13
apply.
14
Procedure 26 and 37 is encouraged.
15
correspondence in an attempt to resolve the issues. All such written exchanges shall be included
16
as exhibits to motions to compel. Amendments to discovery responses served after the filing of
17
and in response to a motion to compel are strongly disfavored, absent good faith.
Nevertheless, voluntary compliance with this provision of Federal Rules of Civil
At a minimum, the parties shall exchange written
18
A discovery motion that does not comply with all applicable rules will be stricken and
19
may result in the imposition of sanctions. Further, a motion is not appropriate to compel
20
documents that are equally available to the moving party. For example, Plaintiff may not file a
21
motion to compel production of documents contained in his/her own central file.
22
II.
DEPOSITIONS
23
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendants may depose Plaintiff
24
and any other witness confined in a prison, and may do so by video conference 3 or in person,
25
provided that, at least 15 calendar days before such a deposition, Defendants serve all parties
26
with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Due to security concerns
27
28
3
This permission is on the condition that it is consistent with prison policy and the prison has the needed equipment for the
video deposition.
3
1
and institutional considerations not applicable to the Defendants, Plaintiff must seek leave from
2
the Court to depose incarcerated witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2).
3
Disagreement with any directive of security staff at the correctional facility at which the
4
deposition is scheduled is not a basis for Plaintiff to refuse to answer appropriate questions, and
5
the failure of Plaintiff to attend, be sworn, and answer appropriate questions may result in
6
sanctions. Such sanctions may include dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
7
Procedure 37. Objections made in good faith in accordance with governing rules are permissible.
8
Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion for protective order pursuant to Federal
9
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary.
10
III.
SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
11
A. All discovery, including the filing of any motions to compel, SHALL be completed
12
on or before 01/14/2019. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be considered if filed
13
after the discovery deadline.
14
B. Dispositive motions must be filed on or before 03/14/2019. The defense SHALL also
15
lodge a Word version of any dispositive motion and the motion’s supporting documents to
16
gsaorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
17
IV.
EXTENSIONS OF TIME
18
Requests for extensions of the deadlines set forth in this Discovery and Scheduling Order
19
must be filed on or before the expiration of the date in question. These deadlines are firm
20
and will not be extended by the Court except upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P.
21
16(b)(4).
22
23
The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and are
reminded that failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions.
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 13, 2018
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?