Jaimes v. Barnes et al

Filing 34

ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Robert J. Barnes signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/24/2015. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN JAIMES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. DR. ROBERT J. BARNES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT ROBERT J. BARNES [ECF Nos. 31, 32] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Robert J. Barnes, Finnigan, Kauffman, and 19 20 Case No.: 1:14-cv-00952-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Juan Jaimes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Neighbors for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. On September 15, 2015, Defendants Finnigan, Kauffman, and Neighbors filed an answer to the 21 22 first amended complaint. On September 21, 2015, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order 23 setting forth the applicable deadlines for which the action shall proceed. On September 21, 2015, Defendant Barnes filed an answer to the first amended complaint. In 24 25 light of the fact that the discovery and scheduling order was issued prior to the filing of Defendant 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Barnes’s answer, Defendant Barnes is advised that the discovery and scheduling order issued 2 September 21, 2015, is extended and made applicable to him as well as Defendants Finnigan, 3 Kauffman, and Neighbors. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 September 24, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?