Francisco Nieves Reyes v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al

Filing 32

Stipulation Re: Continuance of Scheduling Conference Pending Mediation and Order Thereon. The Scheduling Conference is now set for August 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/09/2015. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Gregory N. Karasik (SBN 115834) Karasik Law Firm 11835 W. Olympic Blvd. Ste. 1275 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel (310) 312-6800 Fax (310) 943-2582 greg@karasiklawfirm.com Sahag Majarian II – State Bar No. 146621 Law Office of Sahag Majarian II 18250 Ventura Boulevard Tarzana, California 91356 
 Tel: (818) 609-0807; Fax: (818) 609-0892 sahagii@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 14 STIPULATION RE CONTIUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PENDING MEDIATION and ORDER THEREON vs. 15 16 Case No. 1:14-CV-00964 MJS CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK RX LLC; and DOES 1 through 10. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff Francisco Nieves Reyes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS 21 Caremark Corporation (erroneously sued as Caremark RX LLC) (“Defendants”), by and through their 22 respective counsel of record, hereby enter into the following Stipulation re Continuance of Scheduling 23 Conference Pending Mediation and mutually request the Court to enter an order in accordance 24 therewith. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION 1. On February 20, 2015, the Court issued an order establishing the following schedule with respect to Plaintiff’s then anticipated motion for class certification: 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PENDING MEDIATION 1 Filing Deadline May 11 2015 2 Opposition Due June 11, 2015 3 Reply Due June 25, 2015 4 Hearing Date July 31, 2015 5 2. Following the deposition of Defendant with respect to certain topics on April 30, 2015, 6 the parties agreed to suspend discovery and participate in a private mediation. As a result of that 7 agreement, Plaintiff did not file a motion for class certification by the May 11 deadline. 8 9 10 11 12 3. As a result of Plaintiff not filing a motion for class certification by the May 11 deadline, the Court set a scheduling conference for July 31, 2015. 4. The parties recently confirmed mediation arrangements. The mediation is scheduled to take place on July 30, 2015 before mediator Barry Winograd. 5. In light of the foregoing, the parties mutually request that the scheduling conference be 13 continued for approximately 30 days. 14 Dated: June 8, 2015 KARASIK LAW FIRM 15 By 16 17 18 Dated: June 8, 2015 19 21 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Jennifer B. Zargarof Jennifer B. Zargarof Attorneys for Defendants ORDER 22 23 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By 20 /s/ Gregory N. Karasik Gregory N. Karasik Attorneys for Plaintiff Good cause having been shown, the scheduling conference presently set for July 31, 2015 is continued to August 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 9, 2015 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PENDING MEDIATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PENDING MEDIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?